Video of Arsonist-Notre Dame

It should’ve been on every newscast in the world.  Instead, alt-news web sites are the only ones showing evidence pointing toward what I’ve said all along:  MUSLIMS SET THE FIRE IN THE NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL.

See the source image

Man in Muslim robe and headdress walks along Notre Dame Cathedral as it begins to burn.

VIDEO 1 – As the fire on the roof rages, we see a Muslim man walking on the exterior balcony of the bell towers.   Notice the traditional Islamic white skull cap.  [Video uploaded by Dave Klassix on YouTube.)

VIDEO 2 – Shortly after five p.m, less than two hours before the fire began, we see a man on the roof.  Three flashes of light go off.  Is this the same man in Video 1?  Are these incendiary devices set by remote control?  [Video uploaded by Ola Andersson on YouTube.)

These are questions the MSM and French officials should be asking, regardless of their “official explanation” – an electrical short in the wiring.  (All the wiring had been replaced in the 1990’s and is not old as they have tried to lie about.)  Hadn’t the media/French gov’t made up their minds while the fire was still burning?  Or is it because they don’t want to admit the truth?  The fire was set by Islamic immigrants they invited into their country.

How did the fire burn so quickly?  Have you ever felt solid oak?  It’s as hard as a rock and does not burn easily.  What really fueled that fire?

Why were the firemen so slow to react?  Why did it take up to three hours for them to begin spraying water on the fire, after it was already out of control?  The MSM ridicules Pres. Trump for tweeting “Must act quickly”.  Since when did common sense become something you laugh at?

Another damning question:  Why was a tweet removed saying Macron would rebuild Nortre Dame in accordance with the times?  What is Notre Dame going to be replaced with?  Is this what they wanted all along?

The Notre Dame fire is being referred to as France’s 9/11 in more ways than one.  Just as the U.S. gov’t knew Bin Laden/al-Qaeda were going to attack, so I believe the French gov’t knew of the plot to destroy Notre Dame.


Easter Sunday – April 21, 2019, Sri Lanka.  290 people are killed and 500 injured when a radical Muslim terrorist group named “National Thowheed Jamath” set off a series of bombs in Christian churches and 5-star hotels.  (One of attackers is named Mohammed Aziz Mohammed.)  The media has refused to name them as Muslim, calling them “religious fanatics”.

See the source image

What is the goal of the controllers?  Why are obvious facts being swept under the rug?  Why is it now “racist” to say Muslim terrorists did something?  What if we here in the U.S. have to start dealing with the same problems Europe is having if Trump is replaced with a Democrat eager and willing to take in these foreign devils?

See the source image

Muslims cheer on the burning church.

Text ©2019 – EricReports

Notre Dame Fire (when you know it was the Muslims)


Image result for notre dame fire, images

Paris, France.  April 14, 2019.

Notre Dame Cathedral, Europe’s greatest architectural triumph and symbol of the Catholic church, became engulfed in flames and was partially destroyed.

The MSM immediately blamed the fire on a “renovation accident” and not on the millions of Muslim immigrants who have sworn Islam will conquer Europe.  No evidence so far on how this “accident” occurred or the coincidence of the fire erupting during Easter week.

During recent months, several Christian churches have been burned at the hands of Muslim terrorists.  The one sole man who was willing to say this on Fox News yesterday was promptly removed for “preaching hate”.

Witnesses state that during the first hour, firemen were slow to act.  Later, they were praised for their actions.  If I was in charge, I’d fire the whole fucking lot.

See the source image  Pres. Trump was derided for tweeting the above statement.  The leftist media scoffed saying water would collapse the structure.  The church was allowed to burn throughout the entire night.

Citizens, the Western World is in an undeclared war with the barbaric hoards.   How many acts of terrorism does it take for the collective left to pull their heads out of their collective butts and realize these sub-humans want to kill us?  And if you’re stupid enough not to care because it happened far, far away, I’m telling you more of the same is coming here.  (Last week, MN. Congresswoman Omar commented that 9/11 was done by “some people who did something.”)

See the source image

Regardless of your opinion on the matter, it’s a simple statement of fact:  You must choose sides.  It’s us versus them.  Co-existence is not an option.

Text (C) 2019 – Eric Reports

The Haunting of Sharon Tate

The Haunting of Sharon Tate poster.png Fifty years after the murder of actress Sharon Tate, “Hollywood Babylon” releases a docudrama focusing on the final days and the final horrors of her life.  Starring co-producer Hilary Duff, the film mythologizes Tate, theorizing how she supposedly had a premonition of the “Helter Skelter” murders of August 1969.  The ghoulish proceedings of the Manson clan have been documented before in “Helter Skelter” (1976, 2004) and “The Manson Family” (2003.)  If this movie was meant to be about Mrs. Sharon Tate Polanski, why not show more of her life prior to her grisly end?

Her six films span from 1966 to 1969…


Probably her best performance was as Odile de Carey in “Eye of the Devil” (1966.)  Sharon nails down her British accent perfectly, has an air of forbidden mystery and works well with her costars (David Niven, Deborah Kerr, David Hemmings and Donald Pleasence.)  The original title “13” forecasts some of the bad luck that would befall it.  The original star, Kim Novak, was forced to quit after a horse-riding accident.  (She had already filmed three-quarters of her performance.)  MGM, prior to release, cut down its length, causing gaps in the storyline.  The film did not receive good reviews and wasn’t a financial success.

“Don’t Make Waves” (1967) stars Tony Curtis and Claudia Cardinale.  Sharon appears as “Malibu” seen mostly in a bikini.  Afterward, regarding the publicity, Sharon refers to herself as “sexy little me.”  Her new image:  a free-spirited sex-symbol.

See the source image

The Fearless Vampire Killers or Pardon Me, But Your Teeth are in My Neck” aka “Dance of the Vampires” (1967.)  Sharon meets director Roman Polanski, beginning an affair, ending in marriage.  FVK has garnered a loyal following throughout the years, especially for the original director’s cut (known as the “European Version”.)  Producer Martin Ransohoff  (also Sharon’s agent) would re-edit and re-dub the film to Polanski’s rage who swore never to work with him again.

“Valley of the Dolls” (1967.)  Based on Jacqueline Susann’s runaway bestseller, what could go wrong?  Plenty.  VOTD still remains on many worst film lists of all time.  The author didn’t like it either; saying she downed some Seconals after seeing it.  First of all, casting Patty Duke as “a great singer” doesn’t work because she can’t sing.  Her performance as Neely O’Hara is off-kilter.  (Duke blamed director Mark Robson, who antagonized both her and Tate.)  What remains is a sweet, sad performance by Sharon as Jennifer North, a doomed starlet.  Barbra Parkins also stars as the classy Anne Welles (partially based on Susann herself.)

“The Wrecking Crew” (1968.)  Last of the Dean Martin-Matt Helm spy series.  Sharon costars as Freya Carlson, Matt’s klutzy assistant.  She received good reviews for her comedic skills.

See the source image

The 13 Chairs aka 12 + 1 (1969.) Odd European comedy with Vittorio Gassmann. Odd because it isn’t particularly funny.  Sharon was pregnant during filming, which the director tried to hide.  Few people have seen this.  Orson Welles has a small role.

See the source image

Shortly before her death, Sharon gave Roman a copy of “Tess of the d’Urbervilles” in hopes of casting her.  The 1979 Polanski film is dedicated to her memory.

Most people know that on 8-9-69, the “Manson Family” (Charles”Tex” Watson, Susan Atkins and Patricia Krenwinkel) would ruthlessly butcher Sharon Tate and her unborn child, Jay Sebring, Wojciech Frykowski, Abigail Folger and Steve Parent.  The official motive was that Charles Manson wanted to set off a race war where the white establishment would be defeated by black militants.  In turn, Manson and his family, would rise up from out of the desert and take control of his new kingdom.

The more likely modus operandi:  Charles Manson wanted to be a rock star.  The closest he came was writing a song for the Beach Boys.  (“Cease to Exist” re-titled “Never Learn Not to Love”.)

Manson met record producer Terry Melcher, who listened to his music, pretended to like it, gave him a false promise of some sort of record deal, then never spoke to him again.

The house Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski lived in was formerly Melcher’s.  Manson went looking for him there and was rudely turned away.  Tate and Manson briefly exchanged looks.  Later, Sharon commented, asking, “Who was that creepy guy?”

The murders were more of a message, not only to Melcher, but to the Hollywood establishment.  “This is what you get for ignoring me.”

“The Haunting of Sharon Tate” has limited showings only in New York City.

Text © 2019 – EricReports