Was there a second shooter involved in the Charlie Kirk assassination?
Video Analysis
In the slowed-down video portion, we see what may be a bullet go through the back right side of Charlie Kirk’s head, then exiting through the left side of his neck. In other words, the entrance wound is the exit wound. If this is true, it would mean Tyler Robinson could not be the shooter.
In another video (not shown), the back part of Charlie’s head appears to move, swell up, when he is shot. At the time, it was explained away as an artifact. If it wasn’t, this is further proof.
Blood? On the right side of Charlie’s head, is there a burst of blood? Or is it the cross he was wearing that flew backwards?
The weakest part of the video is RangeDayBro’s belief that the black blob looks like an assassin. It doesn’t.
The FBI
There are many holes in the FBI’s explanation as to how Tyler Robinson could smuggle a rifle in and out of campus. Even disassembled, how would it fit into his little back-pack, which was also filled with a second set of clothes. (How many times did this guy change his clothes? First before, then after. Is Tyler Houdini? Not believable.)
Tyler Robinson
After the shooting, when Tyler is seen walking thru a neighborhood, where’s the rifle? Did he disassemble it, then reassemble it? How and when if he left the screwdriver on the roof?
September 10, 2025. Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah. The American Comeback Tour.
Conservative commentator and activist Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck while speaking before university students. Kirk died shortly after being taken to the hospital.
Who Did It?
The FBI have released this photo. This man is a “Person of interest” in the execution of Charlie Kirk.
In cell phone videos, a gunman can be seen on the roof of the Lossee Center Building 250 yards away. The FBI found a sniper’s high-powered bolt-action rifle.
Photo on the left shows the gunman ready to fire. Charlie Kirk handed out MAGA hats before speaking.
At first, police arrested a man who said, “I’d do it again!” This man was a decoy,. This gave time for the real killer to escape. The similarities between the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk should tell you where this is coming from. The Democratic Party has a history of violence: riots, protests, and domestic terrorist groups (Antifa, Black Lives Matter.)
Charlie Kirk attracted young people. Democrats consider the youth vote as their property (along with blacks, feminists, illegal aliens and homosexuals.)
Kirk was a charismatic speaker who presented a danger to the left. So they took him out. This is part of their strategy to take back Congress and the White House.
There were predictable reactions from the media (MSM) who said this is what happens when you practice “hate speech”. In reality, Kirk was a moderate. Sadly, unless you tow the current woke Communist line, you’re branded a “Nazi”.
Outcome. If I had to predict, I’d say the shooter is suicided (ala Epstein.) “Lone wolf nutcase. Move along please.”
For the Dems celebrating this, how do you explain it to Kirk’s wife and two children?
[VIDEO ABOVE.] President Trump speaks on the sudden death of friend Charlie Kirk.
