Charlie Kirk Betrayed Again – Mikey McCoy

Posted on by

VIDEO Analysis

The only relevant part of this video is the first nine minutes.  Here we will see Charlie Kirk with his chief of staff Mikey McCoy.  McCoy has worked for TPUSA for six years and was hired by Charlie himself.

Mikey McCoy and Charlie Kirk

Sept. 10, 2025.  Orem, Utah.  Mikey McCoy is videoing Charlie as he arrives at his final destination as part of his “American Comeback Tour”.   All goes normally until 12:23 p.m. when Kirk is shot by an unknown gunman.  What is Mikey McCoy’s reaction?  He walks away as if nothing has happened.

What is the explanation?  Will Mikey McCoy say he left not knowing what happened?  There was screaming and pandemonium following a gunshot.  Even if you want to use the argument that he didn’t see it – he must have heard it.  He must have seen people running away in a panic.

Turning Point USA has a lot of questions to answer.  TPUSA has thus far, accepted the asinine MSM version of the event.  Everything else is a “conspiracy theory”.   Do they expect the perpetrators of this crime to come forward and confess?  Pastor Rob McCoy, Mikey’s father, scoffs and scolds his congregation for blaming anybody and anything that doesn’t agree with the official narrative.  Oh yeah, Rob McCoy was one of those on the Sept. 8th conference call where Charlie said he will no longer support Israel.

Charlie Kirk was killed because he was unafraid of speaking the truth.  They could not buy him, they could not debate him, they could not silence him, so they killed him.

Democrats and the left celebrated his death because they are on the side of Satan and evil.  Charlie was on the side of God.

New sculpture of Jesus with Charlie Kirk

Text © 2025 – EricReports

Charlie Kirk’s Second Shooter: Video Evidence

Posted on by

VIDEO ANALYSIS:  VIDEO BY TRIGGERSMART (which is in no way affiliated with this website.)

For the most part, I’ll be concentrating on who is responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk.  The beginning of the video (first six minutes) discusses his autopsy.

The theory of the video – A vehicle parked behind Charlie’s tent as he was speaking.  As observed, it is possible to see an outline or silhouette through the tent’s canvas.

At 12:23 p.m., the assassin shoots into the back of the head.   This causes a bulge and his hair to move.  Because Charlie’s neck swells enormously, the cross pendant flies upward, breaking.  According to the video, the cross goes into the side of his neck, causing the blood to jet out.

Most importantly, let’s discuss what happens after the fifteen and a half minute mark.  This is where there is a security failure breakdown, whether done carelessly or deliberately.  (As mentioned previously, I believe it was deliberate.)  People are allowed to walk around, to the side and in back of Charlie Kirk.  It seems the only function of “Integrity Security Solutions” was to stop somebody from physically attacking Charlie as he spoke.  Otherwise, it was a free-for-all.

As described in the video, there are men in the car, possibly a man in the trunk and a man with a pony-tail blocking what’s going on.  One man holds what could be an AR-15 with a silencer.  It’s barrel can be seen in the above video picture.  Once bodyguard Dan Flood steps aside after making his hand signal, Charlie is shot.

At 21 minutes, we see a still frame of the bullet caught in motion sequentially.

How does this fit in with the gunman on the roof?

If Charlie Kirk was assassinated from what appears to be an SUV, then the man on the roof firing was a decoy.  That would explain the Mauser 30.06 rifle found later by police.  Simply stated, it would be impossible for a 30.06 to have been used.  The damage done would have been enormous.

Yes, people at UVU heard a 30.06.  But the bullet that killed Charlie was a smaller caliber.  This would also explain why the crime scene was covered-up and paved-over.  The 30.06 bullet lies underneath.

Text © 2025 – ERN

New Videos

Posted on by

Charlie Kirk’s 2nd Shooter?

Posted on by

Was there a second shooter involved in the Charlie Kirk assassination?

Video Analysis

In the slowed-down video portion, we see what may be a bullet go through the back right side of Charlie Kirk’s head, then exiting through the left side of his neck.  In other words, the entrance wound is the exit wound.  If this is true, it would mean Tyler Robinson could not be the shooter.

In another video (not shown), the back part of Charlie’s head appears to move, swell up, when he is shot.  At the time, it was explained away as an artifact.  If it wasn’t, this is further proof.

Blood?  On the right side of Charlie’s head, is there a burst of blood?  Or is it the cross he was wearing that flew backwards?

The weakest part of the video is RangeDayBro’s belief that the black blob looks like an assassin.  It doesn’t.

The FBI

There are many holes in the FBI’s explanation as to how Tyler Robinson could smuggle a rifle in and out of campus.  Even disassembled, how would it fit into his little back-pack, which was also filled with a second set of clothes.  (How many times did this guy change his clothes?  First before, then after.  Is Tyler Houdini?  Not believable.)

Tyler Robinson

After the shooting, when Tyler is seen walking thru a neighborhood, where’s the rifle?  Did he disassemble it, then reassemble it?  How and when if he left the screwdriver on the roof?

Text © 2025 – EricReports

Charlie Kirk Assassinated

Posted on by

September 10, 2025.  Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah.  The American Comeback Tour.

Conservative commentator and activist Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck while speaking before university students.  Kirk died shortly after being taken to the hospital.

Who Did It?

The FBI have released this photo. This man is a “Person of interest” in the execution of Charlie Kirk.

In cell phone videos, a gunman can be seen on the roof of the Lossee Center Building 250 yards away.  The FBI found a sniper’s high-powered bolt-action rifle.

Photo on the left shows the gunman ready to fire.  Charlie Kirk handed out MAGA hats before speaking. 

At first, police arrested a man who said, “I’d do it again!”  This man was a decoy,.  This gave time for the real killer to escape.   The similarities between the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk should tell you where this is coming from.  The Democratic Party has a history of violence:  riots, protests, and domestic terrorist groups (Antifa, Black Lives Matter.)

Charlie Kirk attracted young people.  Democrats consider the youth vote as their property (along with blacks, feminists, illegal aliens and homosexuals.)

Kirk was a charismatic speaker who presented a danger to the left.  So they took him out.  This is part of their strategy to take back Congress and the White House.

There were predictable reactions from the media (MSM) who said this is what happens when you practice “hate speech”.  In reality, Kirk was a moderate.  Sadly, unless you tow the current woke Communist line, you’re branded a “Nazi”.

Outcome.  If I had to predict, I’d say the shooter is suicided (ala Epstein.)  “Lone wolf nutcase.  Move along please.”

For the Dems celebrating this, how do you explain it to Kirk’s wife and two children?

[VIDEO ABOVE.]  President Trump speaks on the sudden death of friend Charlie Kirk.

Text © 2025 EricReports