Dems Want to Erase 1st Amendment

Posted on by

If you’ve visited X lately, you’ll notice top Democratic leaders stating they want to get rid of the First Amendment.  These are the deep state scum who are running our country (and it sure as hell isn’t Biden.)

Even the left wing rag known as “Time” puts devil horns on HRC.

It’s Hillary Clinton.

It’s Nancy Pelosi.

It’s Barack Obama.

It’s Kamala Harris.

It’s Tim Walz.

It’s Chuck Schumer.

It’s John Kerry.

It’s AOC.

It’s Tim Walz.

The central statment is that “hate speech” and “misinformation” isn’t protected by the First Amendment.  They have taken it a step further saying free speech itself is dangerous.  Or, if that message isn’t approved by the government, it isn’t true.

The general public (“normies”) don’t know about it and don’t have the time or inclination to go beyond what they hear on the MSM news.  They sure aren’t readinig this website.  This means that our right to free speech, our right to assemble, our right to practice the religion of our choice, and our right to petition is being threatened by the Democrats who are telling you that Trump is “a threat to our democracy”.

Despite what you hear from the current fake polls, Trump is likely to win the 2024 General Election.  The DNC will do anything to stop him as you’ve seen from two assassination attempts the media doesn’t want to talk about.  Yes, the Democrat leaders are trying to kill Trump.  They will laugh it off as a conspiracy theory or something from a Tom Clancy novel.  Even the greenest rube who does the least amount of digging on the Internet will be able to figure out the left is plotting to kill Trump.  It’s a fact.

The left is planning their own kind of dictatorship.  When the top Dems start talking about getting rid of the First Amendment and the Supreme Court and when Trump is nearly killed twice, don’t tell me it’s a coincidence or a conspiracy theory.

Fran Lebowitz is asking Biden to get rid of the Supreme Court.

Text © 2024 – ERN

Debate 3 – Good vs. Evil

Posted on by

Image result for images, good trump vs. evil hillary debate 3

Debate 3, Las Vegas, NV.  As I predicted, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton came at each other fired up on all cylinders.  Now America is faced with an important choice.  HRC is the most distrusted, dishonest and hated presidential candidate ever.  Her only chance of winning is by quota – i.e., “the first woman president”.  Otherwise, she would not stand a chance.  In the debate, she looked tired, angry and mean.  Her usual self.  (There is some talk that a special camera filter was used to make her seem more presentable.  I noticed a strange, orange hue on her white pantsuit.)  Again, Mrs. C tried her “victory smile” which resembled a sick Jack-o-Lantern.  There was no Debate One “happy dance shimmy” (In reality, a suppressed convulsion.)

Image result for images, hillary debate, shimmy  (Some say The Donald muttered “seizure” when she did this.)

Trump’s best moments:

Accusing a speechless Hillary of sending thugs to start riots at a Chicago rally.  Obama-Clinton allowing ISIS/ISIL to form after leaving Iraq.  Asking her to give money back to Arab countries which support terrorism and kill/torture women and gays.  Reminding us on how she wants to admit 65,000 Muslim immigrants.

Hillary’s best moments:

Hillary’s lawyer training comes in handy here.  She has a way of hammering away on her talking points.  (Whether they’re true or not.)  Saying Trump used “Chinese steel” and “foreign workers” didn’t help him.  Saying Trump is “dark” and “dangerous” might frighten off some nervous soccer moms.

HRC repeated herself too often from what worked in Debate One, e.g., dragging up his father’s million dollar loan.  Saying Trump might set off a nuke is ludicrous, considering we’re on the brink of war with Russia, thanks to Obama-Clinton-Kerry-Biden.

Moderator Chris Wallace brought up the unproven accusations  of women being kissed without written permission by Trump.  It went nowhere.  Wallace/Clinton tried to paint Trump in a corner by asking him to pledge he’d accept the vote count on Election Day.  Trump wisely refused.  Knowing how Dems cheat, there’s a chance he might have to contest the election, as Al Gore did in 2000.  (No, it’s not “unprecedented” as she said.)

Opinion.  For those saying, “Well, if Hillary is elected, we can survive it,” I say, “Where will we be afterwards?”  We, as a nation, cannot survive choosing leaders who are criminal in nature.  HRC should be in a federal prison.  She destroyed evidence, lied to the FBI, colluded with criminals to disrupt Trump rallies and stole money laundered through the Clinton Foundation.  The Middle East is a disaster and if she’s president it can only get worse.  There’s no doubt in my mind, war is right around the corner if we elect another President Clinton.

Final Results – Debate Winners

Debate 1 – Clinton.

Debate 2 – Trump.

Debate 3 – Trump.

Best line overall was from Debate 2:  Hillary Clinton said, “It’s awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country.”

Donald Trump’s response:  “Because you’d be in jail.”

Text © 2016 – ERN

Is the War on Terror Over? (Farsi Island incident)

Posted on by

On 1-12-2016, a U.S. patrol boat wandered fifty miles into Iranian waters and was promptly captured. Nine men and one woman were held, humiliated and forced to apologize. The woman was made to wear a head-covering.  This all occurred, coincidently, on the day Pres. Obama made his last, formal address to the nation.  (He, of course, did not mention the incident.)

Is the War on Terror lost?

If the soldiers had been actors, such behavior would make sense.  What are their guns for?  What were they trained for?  Surrender?  How do you get lost by fifty miles?  Was this done on purpose?  Were they somehow forced into it? 

Our current Commander-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, is working for the enemy.  There’s no doubt his administration caused this to happen.  I think they enjoyed watching this defeat.  They relished it.  Sec’t of State John Kerry said we should be “grateful” for their release.

What is the real motivation behind this?  Obama and his cohorts paid a ransom – billions of dollars of unfrozen Iranian assets, plus the release of more al-Qaeda prisoners from Gitmo.

The MSM have covered this up as a military blunder.  Anyway you look at it, it’s a disaster.  Everybody knows that with Obama as president, we’re nothing but a paper tiger.

Coming Soon! – Obama Antichrist 2

Text Copyright 2016 – EricReports

Iran – A Nuclear Powderkeg

Posted on by

July 13, 2015.  As expected, Pres. Obama announced that a nuclear deal had been made with Iran.  VP Biden stood by BHO’s side, nodding eagerly, his faithful dog.

Proponents declared that “This was the best deal they could make,” and “That it wise, even prudent, for Obama/Kerry to sign it.”  Opponents said that “Our President gave away the store, giving in to a plan that benefits Iran and gives us nothing in return.”  Politics aside, what is the real truth?  The truth is –

Pres. Obama and Sec’t of State Kerry did not have to make this deal.  It was made because Obama has eighteen months left in office and time is running out for our first Muslim president.  Clearly, Obama is working for the other side.  In John Kerry’s “negotiations”, he gave Iran everything they wanted and more.  Obama said this peace agreement will keep us safe from war.  Nonsense.  Iran will not keep their word.  “Inspections (given them 24 days notice) are meaningless.  Did you know that no U.S. inspectors are allowed and that Iran may still refine weapons-grade uranium?

Fact – Iran doesn’t need this type of nuclear program unless their building a bomb.  They’re swimming in oil.  That is their economy.  So, why?  What is their goal?  And Obamas?

The end goal is a world dominated by Sharia Law and a Muslim caliphate.  Obama has duped his core-followers by saying, “It’s all about peace.”  I don’t see anything peaceful coming from a nuclear Iran.  I see death and destruction.  I see WWIII.

Obama, the U.N. and the USA have made their deal with the devil.

Text (C) 2015 – EricReports

Who Will Run Against Hillary Clinton?

Posted on by

At this time of this writing, the Republican deep bench list of presidential candidate totals thirteen. Political pundits change their minds daily as to whom the frontrunner is.  Does it matter?  It’s already been decided.  Why do I say this?

In 1980, Pres. Ronald Reagan didn’t want George H.W. Bush as his VP.  He wanted Jack Kemp.  So, why didn’t he pick him?  Because there are forces behind the scenes that make things happen.

Election 2000 – VP Al Gore had more votes than George W. Bush.  Bush won the Electoral College vote, but wouldn’t have except for the key state of Florida.  (Gov. Jeb Bush, FL)

In the recounts, I’m convinced Gore would have won, if the Supreme Court hadn’t stopped it.  How’d that happen?

Election 2004 – Bush wins easily over John Kerry on the strength of “keeping us safe” after 9/11.  It would have been nice to keep us safe during 9/11.

Election 2016 – Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton.  It’s all rigged, folks.