Charlie Kirk’s Second Shooter: Video Evidence

VIDEO ANALYSIS:  VIDEO BY TRIGGERSMART (which is in no way affiliated with this website.)

For the most part, I’ll be concentrating on who is responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk.  The beginning of the video (first six minutes) discusses his autopsy.

The theory of the video – A vehicle parked behind Charlie’s tent as he was speaking.  As observed, it is possible to see an outline or silhouette through the tent’s canvas.

At 12:23 p.m., the assassin shoots into the back of the head.   This causes a bulge and his hair to move.  Because Charlie’s neck swells enormously, the cross pendant flies upward, breaking.  According to the video, the cross goes into the side of his neck, causing the blood to jet out.

Most importantly, let’s discuss what happens after the fifteen and a half minute mark.  This is where there is a security failure breakdown, whether done carelessly or deliberately.  (As mentioned previously, I believe it was deliberate.)  People are allowed to walk around, to the side and in back of Charlie Kirk.  It seems the only function of “Integrity Security Solutions” was to stop somebody from physically attacking Charlie as he spoke.  Otherwise, it was a free-for-all.

As described in the video, there are men in the car, possibly a man in the trunk and a man with a pony-tail blocking what’s going on.  One man holds what could be an AR-15 with a silencer.  It’s barrel can be seen in the above video picture.  Once bodyguard Dan Flood steps aside after making his hand signal, Charlie is shot.

At 21 minutes, we see a still frame of the bullet caught in motion sequentially.

How does this fit in with the gunman on the roof?

If Charlie Kirk was assassinated from what appears to be an SUV, then the man on the roof firing was a decoy.  That would explain the Mauser 30.06 rifle found later by police.  Simply stated, it would be impossible for a 30.06 to have been used.  The damage done would have been enormous.

Yes, people at UVU heard a 30.06.  But the bullet that killed Charlie was a smaller caliber.  This would also explain why the crime scene was covered-up and paved-over.  The 30.06 bullet lies underneath.

Text © 2025 – ERN

Leave a Reply